AI ROI
AI implementation costs: what actually goes in the budget
The real cost structure of an AI implementation — build, integration, evaluation, change management, inference, human review and maintenance — and how each line behaves over time.
Miguel Torres, Founder, Merjora · Published 16 August 2026 · Updated 3 September 2026
In short
AI implementation cost has two shapes: a one-off build cost covering discovery, data access, integration, evaluation and change management, and a recurring run cost covering model usage, human review, monitoring and maintenance. For mid-market process automation, the recurring cost is commonly 25-40% of the first-year build cost annually, and human review is frequently the single largest recurring line — which is why business cases that model inference cost alone understate total cost of ownership.
Key takeaways
- Model usage is rarely the dominant cost. Review and integration usually are.
- Budget evaluation explicitly, or quality debates will consume the timeline instead.
- Run cost grows with adoption; model it against year-two volumes, not year-one.
- Maintenance is an operating line, not a project phase.
One-off cost lines
- Discovery and baseline measurement
- Data access, cleaning and pipeline work
- Integration with the systems of record
- Solution build and prompt/model configuration
- Evaluation harness and acceptance testing
- Change management, documentation and training
Recurring cost lines
| Line | Driver | Behaviour over time |
|---|---|---|
| Model / inference usage | Volume × tokens or calls | Grows with adoption and scope creep |
| Human review | Items × review minutes | Falls slowly as confidence thresholds tighten |
| Monitoring and evaluation | Fixed plus per-release | Roughly stable |
| Maintenance and model updates | Change frequency | Spikes when providers deprecate models |
| Support and exception handling | Exception rate | Falls with process fixes, not with model changes |
Where budgets typically break
- Integration effort discovered after approval, because data access was assumed
- Quality thresholds negotiated late, forcing a rebuild of the evaluation approach
- Review workload never reduced, because nobody owned tightening the thresholds
- Scope widened from one workflow step to a whole process mid-delivery
Frequently asked questions
- How much does it cost to implement AI in a mid-sized company?
- It depends entirely on integration depth and review burden, which is why credible providers quote a range after discovery rather than a fixed figure upfront. Merjora publishes its own commercial model transparently on the pricing page.
- Is it cheaper to build or to buy?
- Buy for commodity capability — extraction, transcription, classification. Build only where the workflow logic is a genuine differentiator. The expensive part is almost never the model; it is the integration and the review process around it.
Where would this apply in your business?
Merjora maps your workflows, scores each opportunity and quantifies the likely value range before you spend budget.
Discover your AI opportunitiesRelated reading
Editorial standard. Merjora publishes analysis, frameworks and publicly documented examples. We do not publish invented statistics, unattributed benchmarks or unverified customer stories.